Re: Additional status codes in HTTP/1.1

On 2013-07-25 07:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A user notified me that status codes 428, 429, 431, 511 introduced in
> RFC6585 by Mark & Roy are not mentionned at all in the current 1.1 draft.
>
> Shouldn't we copy them there, or at least add a reference to RFC6585 so
> that implementers know that these codes exist ?
>
> Thanks,
> Willy

No, that would send the wrong message.

The list in the spec is not exhaustive; there's an IANA registry for a 
reason.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 06:19:24 UTC