- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:55:11 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 10 July 2013 04:33, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > My 2 cents: HTTPbis says what it says based on a long discussion of the > topic. IMHO simply saying "should be aligned with whatever 2.0 says" is not > sufficient to change that. If there is any aligning to do, HTTP/2.0 is definitely where the changes will occur. No question. However, we don't need to inherit the baggage of HTTP/1.1. HTTP/2.0 can tighten up these constraints. At least for now, we can be completely intolerant of buggy software. The current text, with adjustments to wording much like Jeff or Michael have suggested, seems in line with that philosophy.
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 16:55:46 UTC