W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate

From: Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:56:16 -0700
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Albert Lunde <atlunde@panix.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E3932862-F69D-4915-AAAF-5AE23A9CE900@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 09:44, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In other
>> words, we say that PUSH_PROMISE MUST NOT include :host or :scheme
>> and that clients MUST ignore them if they are sent.
> 
> I don't like the prohibition because it's too simple.
> 
> Say I do have, as Will points out, a forward proxy.  One huge
> advantage that proxy could provide is push for cross-domain resources.

Do you expect the proxy to parse the HTML of the initial request and push down the resources that it finds in the document? I'm just wondering what the implementation of this would look like. Why would the client trust these resources are from the domains that the proxy claims?

Sam
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 16:56:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC