Re: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate

How would you like editorial comments addressed?

Pull requests against the "layering" branch?


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> Those people who volunteered to contribute to the layering work in the
> SF interim have come up with something.  This includes a restructuring
> of the content.
>
> Since the changes are large in scope, we're not submitting this as
> draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-04.  I've put this up as an individual
> submission so that people can comment on structure, text, omissions:
>
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-unicorn-httpbis-http2-00
>
> Note: This is a proposal for the content of the
> draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-04.  Please let us know - as soon as possible
> - if the idea of this becoming a -04 offends you somehow.
>
> This draft includes resolutions to all the issues on our milestone,
> with the exception of two (#75: default priorities, #17: opaque data
> in GOAWAY and RST_STREAM), which I plan to address tomorrow.
>
> Now, most of the final pass is my fault (with a little help from the
> github unicorn), so blame me for all the bad stuff and praise Jeff and
> James for providing all the good stuff.
>
>