- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:12:57 -0700
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 1 July 2013 10:09, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > We just need to be clear what frames constitute the complete set of "request > headers." Nothing more needs to (or should) be said. I'm with Jeff here. There are plenty of cases where ":path" alone is completely sufficient to produce a response.
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 18:13:24 UTC