Late change to implementation draft?

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:51:03 -0700
• To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnWxzeXk+WxGD6omX7w+YjHYLm6u29KZiUegO=mhmp3m9Q@mail.gmail.com>

The discussion on PUSH_PROMISE leads me to two conclusions:

 . PUSH_PROMISE need only contain *request* headers

 . PUSH_PROMISE isn't baked

The first is what I'd like to confirm.  Without it, I don't think that
we'll get good results from testing push.  Should I make this change
in the first implementation draft?

Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 17:51:30 UTC