W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Questions on Server Push

From: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:23:52 +0900
Message-ID: <51AD3398.80108@iij.ad.jp>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
(2013/06/04 9:07), Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 3 June 2013 17:02, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> wrote:
>> then  PUSH_PROMISE on step2 seemed to be sent from server on the
>> half-closed stream 1. Do we need to change the spec so as to permit
>> to send PUSH_PROMISE on a half-closed stream?
> Half-closed is directional.  You can't send on a stream that is
> half-closed in the direction you are sending, but you can send on the
> open half.  If it weren't directional, the server couldn't send a
> response.

Oh, I understood. I thought "a half-closed stream" means the state of stream
where either endpoint has already sent the FINAL.

The spec means that "A server cannot send a PUSH_PROMISE on a new stream or a half-closed
stream (on which FINAL has already sent from the server)."

Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 00:24:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:11 UTC