- From: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:23:52 +0900
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
(2013/06/04 9:07), Martin Thomson wrote: > On 3 June 2013 17:02, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> wrote: >> then PUSH_PROMISE on step2 seemed to be sent from server on the >> half-closed stream 1. Do we need to change the spec so as to permit >> to send PUSH_PROMISE on a half-closed stream? > > Half-closed is directional. You can't send on a stream that is > half-closed in the direction you are sending, but you can send on the > open half. If it weren't directional, the server couldn't send a > response. Oh, I understood. I thought "a half-closed stream" means the state of stream where either endpoint has already sent the FINAL. The spec means that "A server cannot send a PUSH_PROMISE on a new stream or a half-closed stream (on which FINAL has already sent from the server)." Thanks.
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 00:24:19 UTC