- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:07:58 -0700
- To: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3 June 2013 17:02, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> wrote: > then PUSH_PROMISE on step2 seemed to be sent from server on the > half-closed stream 1. Do we need to change the spec so as to permit > to send PUSH_PROMISE on a half-closed stream? Half-closed is directional. You can't send on a stream that is half-closed in the direction you are sending, but you can send on the open half. If it weren't directional, the server couldn't send a response. > We would be glad if you add some notes about this after > "After sending a PUSH_PROMISE, the server commences transmission of a pushed > resource." > in 4.3.1. Yes, this text isn't completely correct. It may commence transmission, but it can wait before starting. > It might be also related to the description to be written about the stream > lifecycles > as noted on http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#rfc.comment.5 Stream lifecycles are still a work in progress. If you have any specific suggestions, that would be helpful, but at this stage, I'm not sure that we have a good agreement on what the basics are. Anything that we "fix" now will probably change later. --Martin
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 00:08:29 UTC