- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:52:18 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 18:52:46 UTC
For this bike shed, the shorter while still being effective, the better. -=R On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > On 19 May 2013 20:22, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > We've currently incorporated the magic as: > > > >> The client connection header is a sequence of 25 octets (in hex > notation) > >> > >> 464f4f202a20485454502f322e300d0a0d0a4241520d0a0d0a > >> (the string FOO * HTTP/2.0\r\n\r\nBAR\r\n\r\n) followed by a SETTINGS > frame (Section 3.8.4). > > > > That string was based upon the quick testing I did a while back. > > > > I'm curious to know how people feel about this; while it's cosmetic, do > we want to do something a little more... expected, like: > > > > START * HTTP/2.0\r\n\r\nGO\r\n\r\n > > I don't care. Existence > colour for this particular bike shed. > > But I do know that 5 characters isn't going to fly. I know at least > one (major) implementation that only expects 3 or 4 characters before > the space. > >
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 18:52:46 UTC