Re: p2: Accept-Language missing, empty or no match

So long as vary is being used properly still, no objections here.
On Apr 29, 2013 8:24 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Anyone disagree with adding similar text to Accept-Language? If not, I'll
> mark for incorporation.
>
>
> On 20/04/2013, at 6:49 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
> > In p2, Accept, Accept-Charset and Accept-Encoding all have language
> similar to this:
> >
> >> A request without any Accept header field implies that the user agent
> will accept any media type in response. If an Accept header field is
> present in a request and none of the available representations for the
> response have a media type that is listed as acceptable, the origin server
> may either honor the Accept header field by sending a 406 (Not Acceptable)
> response or disregard the Accept header field by treating the response as
> if it is not subject to content negotiation.
> >
> > However, Accept-Language in 5.3.5 does not. Is this intentional?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>