- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:22:20 +1000
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Anyone disagree with adding similar text to Accept-Language? If not, I'll mark for incorporation. On 20/04/2013, at 6:49 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > In p2, Accept, Accept-Charset and Accept-Encoding all have language similar to this: > >> A request without any Accept header field implies that the user agent will accept any media type in response. If an Accept header field is present in a request and none of the available representations for the response have a media type that is listed as acceptable, the origin server may either honor the Accept header field by sending a 406 (Not Acceptable) response or disregard the Accept header field by treating the response as if it is not subject to content negotiation. > > However, Accept-Language in 5.3.5 does not. Is this intentional? > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2013 03:22:45 UTC