W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: WGLC: p4, 304 Not Modified

From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:18:12 -0400
Message-ID: <517E6504.5050709@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Any thoughts on this?

Ken Murchison wrote:
> Hi All,
> In re-reading the latest section 4.1, I'm wondering why ETag was 
> singled out as being a MUST generate, while Last-Modified isn't.  If 
> the server is capable of generating both, shouldn't it return both, as 
> it SHOULD for 200 responses (per section 2.4)?  What if the client 
> only supports Last-Modified and not ETag (e.g. used If-Modified-Since 
> in its request)?
> That being said, if the representation hasn't been modified then 
> presumably none of the validators changed.  What's the point in 
> returning any of them?  Shouldn't it be all or nothing?  Just trying 
> to wrap my head around the logic behind singling out ETag over 
> Last-Modified for 304.
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 12:18:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:10 UTC