Re: p7: editorial suggestions

Ok, makes sense. Consider that feedback for the other parts, then. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 29/04/2013, at 1:49 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2013-04-23 07:09, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Also, the requirements and considerations for registries in our other parts are defined in the IANA Considerations section; here, they're defined in the main document (2.3). Why the difference?
>> ...
> 
> This used to be consistent (in the main document), but it changed some time ago in P1, P2, P4 and P5.
> 
> P6 (Cache-Control Extensions) and P7 (Auth schemes) still have them in the main document.
> 
> Consistency would be good, yes. I personally *prefer* the original placement, because "IANA Considerations" is really *that* and nothing more; the considerations for extensions really are important completely independently of whether somethings gets registered with IANA or not.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 02:28:44 UTC