- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:49:05 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-04-23 07:09, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Also, the requirements and considerations for registries in our other parts are defined in the IANA Considerations section; here, they're defined in the main document (2.3). Why the difference? > ... This used to be consistent (in the main document), but it changed some time ago in P1, P2, P4 and P5. P6 (Cache-Control Extensions) and P7 (Auth schemes) still have them in the main document. Consistency would be good, yes. I personally *prefer* the original placement, because "IANA Considerations" is really *that* and nothing more; the considerations for extensions really are important completely independently of whether somethings gets registered with IANA or not. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 28 April 2013 15:49:40 UTC