- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 05:43:12 +0000
- To: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, "'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
future proofing? E.g. if we need to move to another format or size for stream ID? ------ Original Message ------ From: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> To: "'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 13/04/2013 12:48:46 p.m. Subject: 3.3.1 Frame Header: Purpose of 1-bit reserved field? >3.3.1. Frame Header > > |R| Stream Identifier (31) | > > > R: A reserved 1-bit field. The semantics of this bit are not >defined. > >I was curious about the purpose for the 1-bit reserved field. Can it be >deleted and the Stream Identifier increased to 32 bits? > >https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/67 > > >Brian Raymor >Senior Program Manager >Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. >A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation > > >
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2013 05:43:38 UTC