- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:11:38 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:08:01PM -0800, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 4 December 2012 15:05, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > >> 6. If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then > >> the message body length is zero (no message body is present). > > > > I think it should simply state > > > > 6. If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then > > the message contains no body. > > Is it really useful to distinguish between no body and body with no > content? I can't imagine a use for such a distinction. I think the example with the POST that is rejected without a content-length is valid, I have already observed this one, though I don't remember on what server. Willy
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:12:11 UTC