- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:56:10 +1100
- To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 15/11/2012, at 11:54 AM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote: > > - Are we advertising that port 80 is capable of HTTP/2, or an alternate port for HTTP/2, or (capable of) both? > > imo it has to be an arbitrary port.. if you send anything other than http/1 on port 80 across the general internet you'll get some breakage. Agreed... however, I don't see a reason to make it impossible to say "I support HTTP/2 on port 80 too", so the client can optimistically try to use it first (as long as it can handle breakage). Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:56:31 UTC