Re: on DNS records

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:



> , I personally would be OK saying that the DNS-based optimisation doesn't
> work for HTTP URIs that specify a non-default port. Yes, we may not be able
> to get the first round-trip to our router configuration page perfectly
> optimised, but that's a reasonable price to pay for simplicity. What do
> others think?
>
>
That's my assumption too - I'm fine with that.

>
> - Are we advertising that port 80 is capable of HTTP/2, or an alternate
> port for HTTP/2, or (capable of) both?
>

imo it has to be an arbitrary port.. if you send anything other than http/1
on port 80 across the general internet you'll get some breakage.