Re: on DNS records

Martin,
On 11/14/12 8:13 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 11:09, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>> That's a fair point.  Question: how would you handle SRV with
>> http://www.example.com:49080?
> That was raised in the meeting.  SRV isn't enough for that reason
> alone.  I know too many hosts that operate on different ports.
> Obviously, each port could be given a new name, but that eventually
> leads to an increase in the number of wildcard certificates out there.
>
>

Thanks.  So you would prefer some other record that simply indicates
what version runs on what port and dump transport protocol?  What do
others think?

Eliot

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:19:14 UTC