- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:13:55 -0800
- To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Cc: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 14 November 2012 11:09, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > That's a fair point. Question: how would you handle SRV with > http://www.example.com:49080? That was raised in the meeting. SRV isn't enough for that reason alone. I know too many hosts that operate on different ports. Obviously, each port could be given a new name, but that eventually leads to an increase in the number of wildcard certificates out there.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:14:23 UTC