Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff)

On 2012-10-30 21:40, Zhong Yu wrote:
> Got it. In the spec,
>> Additional header fields define metadata about the selected representation, which might differ from the representation included in the message for responses to some state-changing methods
> So if the current representation has ETag=v1, and PUT sends a new
> representation to which the server assigns ETag=v2, the response to
> PUT may contain ETag of the old representation. (This was not in
> RFC2616)
> ...

Why would it contain the old ETag?

> ...

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 07:14:08 UTC