- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:13:32 +0100
- To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-10-30 21:40, Zhong Yu wrote: > Got it. In the spec, > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-21#section-8.2 >> Additional header fields define metadata about the selected representation, which might differ from the representation included in the message for responses to some state-changing methods > > So if the current representation has ETag=v1, and PUT sends a new > representation to which the server assigns ETag=v2, the response to > PUT may contain ETag of the old representation. (This was not in > RFC2616) > ... Why would it contain the old ETag? > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 07:14:08 UTC