Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1

On 24/10/2012, at 10:20 PM, Nils Goroll <slink@schokola.de> wrote:

> 
>> A UA might decide to "remember" the downgrade longer than the scope of a single connection.
> 
> Then the implication would be that all actual server processes behind an address or fqdn had to support the same version(s).


No - HTTP/1.0 is backwards-compatible with 1.1. There is not interoperability problem, because it still works.


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 23:56:59 UTC