Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1

On 24/10/2012, at 10:20 PM, Nils Goroll <> wrote:

>> A UA might decide to "remember" the downgrade longer than the scope of a single connection.
> Then the implication would be that all actual server processes behind an address or fqdn had to support the same version(s).

No - HTTP/1.0 is backwards-compatible with 1.1. There is not interoperability problem, because it still works.

Mark Nottingham

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 23:56:59 UTC