- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:18:40 -0700
- To: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABP7RbdxzfLqK8Ni3ZJAPW+NmenHLur-EhN+CD3cW4cdwAwsrQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>wrote: > [snip] > > ** ** > > RFC 3986 is written more from the perspective of HTTP GET, so for HTTP > POST we have to read between the lines.**** > > Returning to the issue, we would like to know if it is OK to assume in the > context of an HTTP POST and the above scenario that:**** > > ** ** > > 1. If there is no embedded @base and..**** > > 2. there is no retrieval context for POST and..**** > > 3. no URI was used to retrieve the representation, then..**** > > 4. the default base URI can be set by the application to be the URI of the > created resource.**** > > ** > I would say this is certainly a reasonable and logical assumption. Note, however, that you need to account for the possible presence of the Content-Location header within the POST request. If the POST includes a Content-Location, it's value effectively establishes the base URI. - James > ** > > It might also be helpful if 2616 could provide clarification on these > issues.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for your considered opinions,**** > > Steve.**** > > ** ** > > --**** > > Steve Battle > Semantic Engineer > > Mobile: +44 (0)7503 624 613**** > > E-mail: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk > Web: www.sysemia.com**** > > ** ** > > Sysemia Limited > The Innovation Centre, Bristol & Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent, > Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR > Registered in England and Wales. Company Number: 7555456 > > DISCLAIMER**** > > Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the > addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If you > receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If you are not > the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of distribution, > copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. Attachments to this e-mail may contain > software viruses which may damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken > reasonable steps to minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments > are virus checked before they are opened.**** > > ** ** >
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 15:19:37 UTC