- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:57:06 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-10-08 22:28, James M Snell wrote: > For review and comment... > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-link-method-00.txt > > Updated definition of LINK and UNLINK, taking RFC5988 into consideration > and using language consistent from current httpbis draft (read: > shamelessly and remorselessly lifted). > > Comments and feedback definitely welcome. I think it would be good to consider rev= (supported? optional?) and anchor= (same). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 08:57:38 UTC