- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:32:32 +1100
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Personally, I'm -0 on this; I don't see demand for it yet, and we're really just learning how to build link-driven HTTP APIs. YMMV (in which case I'd be glad to hear about detailed use cases!). Cheers, On 09/10/2012, at 7:28 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > For review and comment... > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-link-method-00.txt > > Updated definition of LINK and UNLINK, taking RFC5988 into consideration and using language consistent from current httpbis draft (read: shamelessly and remorselessly lifted). > > Comments and feedback definitely welcome. > > - James > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 20:33:02 UTC