Re: Status Line Syntax production/parsing

On 29/08/2012, at 5:46 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Well,
> 
> 	HTTP-version SP status-code [ SP reason-phrase ] CRLF
> 
> On the other hand, a ultra-simple syntax for the first line might sense; and there may be code out there relying on it.


Yes, that's the thing. If we were designing this from scratch, that'd make sense; however, we're not, and I'd say it's very likely some implementations depend upon this.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 00:59:20 UTC