- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:46:34 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-08-28 21:09, Karl Dubost wrote: > Bjoern, > > > Le 28 août 2012 à 14:47, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : >> If you are asking about something like >> >> HTTP/1.1<sp>200<crlf> >> >> Without the <sp> after the status code, then no, that is not fine. > > Yes, that was my reading too. Thanks for confirming. > I was wondering if it was intentional, because a meaningful trailing space is likely to create interoperability issues. Though I have nothing to backup that. It might not be a concern at all. > > Basically I would have proposed something such as > > status-line = HTTP-version SP status-code (CRLF|SP reason-phrase CRLF) > > so handling the case with no trailing space. Well, HTTP-version SP status-code [ SP reason-phrase ] CRLF On the other hand, a ultra-simple syntax for the first line might sense; and there may be code out there relying on it. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 19:47:09 UTC