- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:06:16 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABP7RbcMO3yL3D0vtnPmU63CNKgYLzMa+Eveo52edBVBK8m72Q@mail.gmail.com> , James M Snell writes: >The more I read through this conversation, the more I worry that all this >talk about zero-latency upgrade negotiation through multiple hops of >arbitrary 1.1 or 2.0 servers is going to lead to significantly more >complexity than originally hoped -- and not the acceptable good kind of >complexity that delivers real benefits in the end. That's my conclusion too. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 06:06:45 UTC