- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:08:14 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 31.07.2012 06:04, Mike Belshe wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com > <mailto:masinter@adobe.com>> wrote: > > Your post is consistent with the assertion that there isn't > agreement yet about what "faster than HTTP/1.1" means, or how to > compare proposals for improvement. And neither measured worst case > latency or real network traffic with buffer bloat, or situations > that would detect the impact of HOL blocking. > > > While SPDY leaves a tiny HOL issue, it fixes the massive one from > HTTP/1.1, which can only load a couple of resources in parallel per > domain (2 by spec, 6 by implementation best practices). The tradeoff > turns out to be a boon in terms of reduced latency while also using > fewer network resources. > ... "By spec" in RFC 2616, but not in HTTPbis (this has been fixed a LONG time ago!). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 07:09:06 UTC