Re: Re[2]: Straw-man for our next charter

oddly, the subject of this thread is "our next charter" and my discussion is about what the next charter should say. So I'm bewildered by your repeating that you think my comment is out of order,

The use case given for limiting semantics changes  is to enable 1.1 <--> 2:0 gateways.  Adaptations which can be handled in gateways should be in scope for consideration, if they meet other HTTP/2 goals.

-----Original message-----
From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 07:58:59 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Straw-man for our next charter

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
> HTTP 2.0 can tighten requirements where loose interpretation in HTTP 1.x leads to performance, reliability, security problems.

Where does the charter say that?  My reading of the charter is that
"changes to the existing semantics of HTTP are out of scope."

Adam