Re: HTTP2 Expression of Interest : Squid

On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 23:36 -0700, Roberto Peon wrote:
> That would be pretty pointless-- at that point the browser should just
> send the data. The model in SPDY is push and let cancel.
> Server push is just better inlining.

fwiw .. The middle ground is use of flow control to limit the amount of
data that can be pushed.. that way small pushes that are rtt bound still
get performance benefits and bigger pushes have a limited amount of
bandwidth they can consume before being validated by a url
filter. (and of course from a browser pov the leading bytes of a
response are more interesting than the trailing bytes, so even this
partial push before the window-update rtt after going through the filter
is quite valuable).

I intend to experiment with that approach.

> Let's discuss this in  a separate thread...
> -=R
> On Jul 15, 2012 11:34 PM, "James M Snell" <> wrote:

>         One possibility to throw in here would be a simple requirement
>         that the server has to ask the client before it pushes... a
>         reverse 100-Continue if you will... require the server to tell
>         the client what content it is trying to push and give the
>         client the opportunity to say No.... intervening proxies, such
>         as a corporate firewall, would be capable of answering on the
>         users behalf. 
>         - James

Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 13:50:46 UTC