Note that, if ever one will wish to implement server push or anything similar, there are ordering requirements that must be placed on at least the content delivery of the requested resource and its associated metadata. It is all cost/benefit tradeoffs, all the way down. :) -=R On Jul 15, 2012 3:31 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2012-07-15 12:19, tom wrote: > >> Support on "My view is that SPDY layering should be separated and the >> non-HTTP layer considered as an alternative transport for HTTP similar >> to TCP, UDP, STCP, CoAP and HTCP which all seek to relay HTTP messages. >> Only the HTTP specific syntax and framing improvements should be >> considered by the WG as input to HTTP/2 specifications." >> > > ... > > +1 > > BTW, we have been running HTTP over UDP (scheme as HTTP) successfully. >> ... >> > > Out of curiosity: who is "we"? > > Best regards, Julian > >
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 17:05:59 UTC