- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:29:54 +0200
- To: tom <zs68j2ee@gmail.com>
- CC: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-07-15 12:19, tom wrote: > Support on "My view is that SPDY layering should be separated and the > non-HTTP layer considered as an alternative transport for HTTP similar > to TCP, UDP, STCP, CoAP and HTCP which all seek to relay HTTP messages. > Only the HTTP specific syntax and framing improvements should be > considered by the WG as input to HTTP/2 specifications." > ... +1 > BTW, we have been running HTTP over UDP (scheme as HTTP) successfully. > ... Out of curiosity: who is "we"? Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 10:30:28 UTC