Re: #372: refactor conditional header field descriptions

On 2012-07-12 09:11, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Thanks; in the meantime I came to the conclusion that the definition of
>> "condition met" for If-None-Match needs to be reversed. (The text was
>> consistent, but in a confusing way). I also made the two definitions
>> more consistent.
>>
>> Proposed patch:
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/372/372.2.diff>
> (...)
>> Feedback appreciated, Julian
>
> The wording and use cases are very clear to me that way and I think this is
> exactly what is needed ! I'd say "please don't change a word".
> ...

Your wish is my command: 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1761>

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 10:17:05 UTC