Re: #372: refactor conditional header field descriptions

Hi Julian,

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Thanks; in the meantime I came to the conclusion that the definition of 
> "condition met" for If-None-Match needs to be reversed. (The text was 
> consistent, but in a confusing way). I also made the two definitions 
> more consistent.
> Proposed patch: 
> <>
> Feedback appreciated, Julian

The wording and use cases are very clear to me that way and I think this is
exactly what is needed ! I'd say "please don't change a word".


Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 07:12:31 UTC