- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:52:04 +0000
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- cc: tom <zs68j2ee@gmail.com>, Kevin Cathcart <kevincathcart@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <CABaLYCtiGRARo34icmhqt-Vx1eK2iBPKKrGHqcJu1Adt4wFxeQ@mail.gmail.com> , Mike Belshe writes: >The reason we didn't separate them so far is because we didn't have any >alternate messaging layers in mind. Further, it wasn't a goal to make the >framing layer generic. That could be done. I'm personally not a supporter >of designing for things you don't know, [...] I'll be happy to do the design for high performance delivery, something which SPDY clearly isn't attempting to tackle. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2012 06:52:29 UTC