- From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:57:58 +0000
- To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
- CC: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, mnot@mnot.net, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 02/24/2012 07:38, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:32PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: >> >> In message <4F46BFDF.3070703@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: >>> >>> 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be >>> considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :) >> >> +1000 > > Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be > deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of > practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed. What makes us > think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more > fertile ground? Because I emphasized the point that SRV has been around for 12 years? I have enough experience to know how difficult it is to deploy new RRs. SRV is not new. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 09:38:26 UTC