- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:03:51 +1300
- To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2/02/2012 4:38 a.m., Zhong Yu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Amos Jeffries<squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >> On 01.02.2012 19:11, Zhong Yu wrote: >> I am pushing to have the conditionals interpreted as a AND condition between >> all present conditionals. >> >> if anything needs a special status response -> do that >> if any of the conditions is invalid => 412 status >> if ( (If-Match x) AND (If-None-Match y or z) AND (if-modified-since T) AND >> ... ) => 2xx status >> otherwise 304 status > I don't quite understand. According to the current draft - > > 1) If there's a single If-Match condition and it tests false, we > should return 412. That would be "special status....". > 2) If there's a single If-None-Match condition and it tests false (and > the method is GET/HEAD), we should return 304. "otherwise ..." > > Your pseudo code doesn't seem to behave this way. > > Zhong yu
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 06:04:35 UTC