- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:45:02 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Mark Nottingham wrote: >On 19/06/2012, at 12:06 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> * Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> What I've been trying to ask, in so many ways, is why THIS case differs >>> from all of the other cases. >> >> If you name a couple, I assume Julian will happily explain where the >> difference is, if there is any; he in fact asked for evidence that the >> drafts are currently inconsistent in this regard, as I understood it, >> anyway. (I'd offer some if I understood your concern well enough...) > >I did, way back when... Okay; Cache-Control is not different from media type parameters here, but media type parameters already have similar language, "The quoted and unquoted values are equivalent." Cache-Control could use the same language if we did not mind that implementations that have trouble with `max-age="5"` would become (more clearly) non-conforming. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 03:45:26 UTC