- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 22:05:39 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2012 05:06:09 UTC
Check out http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/06/09/1927246/an-http-status-code-for-censorship The thinking about returning 403 when you’re forbidden to follow a link seems sound to me. This idea is superficially appealing; is it deeply broken in some way that’s not obvious? -Tim
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2012 05:06:09 UTC