- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:59:27 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Mike Kelly <mike@stateless.co>
On 2012-06-01 03:08, Mark Nottingham wrote: > We've published an -02 draft of LCI: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-linked-cache-inv-02> > > and intend to request publication as an Individual Submission Informational RFC soon (the link relations have just been submitted for review). Feedback still welcome (http list is best, I think). > ... HTTPbis introduces a registry for cache directives (see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-19.html#rfc.section.3.2.3>). Would it make sense to change the dependency from RFC 2616 to HTTPbis, and to register as defined in Part 6? Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 10:59:58 UTC