Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication

On the contrary, I think it's great to have multiple proposals. If you have
your own vision for how this should work, please send it out! :) My
statement was simply an FYI, not a "back off, we've got this!"

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote:

> Perfect then I'll sit tight.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org
> > wrote:
>
>> FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy"
>> internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that
>>> fall under the HTTP/2.0 category?
>>>
>>> I may have some cycles for this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for:
>>>>
>>>> 1. HTTP/2.0
>>>> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes
>>>>
>>>> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>.
>>>>
>>>> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0:
>>>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals>
>>>>
>>>> But none yet for authentication schemes:
>>>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals>
>>>>
>>>> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012.
>>>> It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a  good
>>>> sense of it by then, for discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>