- From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:00 -0700
- To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 21:43:29 UTC
FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy" internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that fall > under the HTTP/2.0 category? > > I may have some cycles for this. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > >> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for: >> >> 1. HTTP/2.0 >> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes >> >> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>. >> >> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0: >> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals> >> >> But none yet for authentication schemes: >> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals> >> >> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012. >> It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a good >> sense of it by then, for discussion. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 21:43:29 UTC