- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:47:22 -0500
- To: Ray <ray.polk@oracle.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ray, We're not here to propagate conspiracy theories. Bringing up anti-trust concerns this early in the process is not helping. Can everyone please reign in the discussion and keep it on the technology, please. Thanks, On 04/04/2012, at 6:26 AM, Ray wrote: > <conspiracyTheory> > ...and give a huge speed advantage to a company wealthy enough to configure their own edge caching infrastructure? thus massively increasing barrier to entry for upstart competition? > </conspiracyTheory> :o > > *spins his rolodex to anti-trust lawyers* > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Stefan Lederer <stefan.lederer@aau.at> wrote: > >>>> It is a different layer of the social interaction using HTTP. >>>> DRM == protect the producer >>>> SSL == protect the user >>>> >>> with client certificates, SSL can somehow also protect the producer ;-) >> >> Another problem when using SSL for HTTP video streams is that caches cannot >> be used very efficiently. This would introduce problems/higher costs in >> content distribution, etc. >> >> Best Regards >> Stefan Lederer >> >> > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 15:47:53 UTC