W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Ascii-based SPDY "compression" idea

From: (wrong string) 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:10:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYg79y39s3M=NpuUSATJQGSFJvE_PKz+rW3ZGeWbUkcQjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
It's unclear to me the point that you're making. Above, Peter said "Since a
SPDY session is associated with a single TCP connection, we can assume all
GETs on that connection are being routed to the same web server." to which
you said "I think that is an unwarranted assumption."

So, just to clarify, we're on agreement that all GETs are being routed to
the same HTTP router, right? I understand that intermediary authors have
concerns about the use of compression at all and also about the type of
compression, but I think that's orthogonal to Peter's above point.

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> In message <CAA4WUYhpCJMNVBdPG8-zg24aEvYdZk171PknEEy5oyWKgi=
> hgw@mail.gmail.com>
> , =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes:
> >--00248c711a11f88a2104bcaf6f27
> >Because if so, then I think the core of Peter's point still
> >stands. The "http-router" can handle all the header
> >compression/decompression for SPDY.
> For small loads, yes, it probably can.
> For 1Tb/s:  No way in hell it can.
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 12:11:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:59 UTC