W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic

From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:22:36 +0000
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Kevin Cathcart" <kevincathcart@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <eme91d7fd4-8cfd-4087-b5a0-2375e8801ae1@boist>
The one time I had to look at it was for H.323, which I believe is 
still quite prevalent, although possibly losing ground to SIP?
according to the ITU, LDAP even uses it?
Looks like it is used in some applications that take some fairly 
serious heat (e.g. WiMAX, UMTS and LTE).
Still not suggesting it for HTTP tho :)

------ Original Message ------
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>;"Mark Nottingham" 
<mnot@mnot.net>;"Kevin Cathcart" 
<kevincathcart@gmail.com>;"ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 1/04/2012 7:21:04 p.m.
Subject: Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic
>In message <CAHBU6ivKQypwvHPf09FjENm57DsPnH=qehbRSknHW+jpyo75dw@mail.gmail.com>
>, Tim Bray writes:
>>Funny you should mention that.  ASN.1 has historically been a
>>miserable failure;
>About the only place ASN.1 survives, are in contexts where the OSI
>protocols was an inspiration or basis for the work:  SNMP and X.50[0-9]
>For SNMP, ASN.1 was a political trick to make SNMP acceptable as a
>"gateway drug" to CMIP.
>For X.50[0-9] I don't know the story.
>Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 11:22:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:59 UTC