- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:26:41 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12/2/11 3:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-02 23:06, Julian Reschke wrote: >> ... >>> (although it does have "431 Request Header Fields Too Large"). Where did >>> we end up on this one? >>> ... >> >> The definition of 413 will be reverted back to what it said before >> change <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1310>. >> ... > > Sorry, me confused about two different headers. > > We did not change 413, as 431 was on the table. > > We *did* extend 503, and this can be backed out if we get 429. You'll get it. I plan to start the IETF Last Call in the next few days. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 22:27:14 UTC