Re: status code for header fields to big

On 12/2/11 3:06 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-12-02 22:36, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I notice that 413 didn't end up in draft-nottingham-http-new-status
> 
> 413 already exists ("Request Entity Too Large"); we thought about
> extending it to cover this case (and did with
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/255) but then decided
> that a new code makes more sense. (So the change for ticket #255 will be
> backed out once we know 431 goes ahead).
> 
> Any while I type this I see you updated the ticket :-)
> 
>> (although it does have "431 Request Header Fields Too Large"). Where did
>> we end up on this one?
>> ...
> 
> The definition of 413 will be reverted back to what it said before
> change <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1310>.

Thanks for the clarifications.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/