Re: status code for header fields to big

On 2011-12-02 22:36, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I notice that 413 didn't end up in draft-nottingham-http-new-status

413 already exists ("Request Entity Too Large"); we thought about 
extending it to cover this case (and did with but then decided 
that a new code makes more sense. (So the change for ticket #255 will be 
backed out once we know 431 goes ahead).

Any while I type this I see you updated the ticket :-)

> (although it does have "431 Request Header Fields Too Large"). Where did
> we end up on this one?
> ...

The definition of 413 will be reverted back to what it said before 
change <>.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 22:07:28 UTC