- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:06:46 +0100
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-12-02 22:36, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I notice that 413 didn't end up in draft-nottingham-http-new-status
413 already exists ("Request Entity Too Large"); we thought about
extending it to cover this case (and did with
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/255) but then decided
that a new code makes more sense. (So the change for ticket #255 will be
backed out once we know 431 goes ahead).
Any while I type this I see you updated the ticket :-)
> (although it does have "431 Request Header Fields Too Large"). Where did
> we end up on this one?
> ...
The definition of 413 will be reverted back to what it said before
change <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1310>.
Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 22:07:28 UTC