Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?

On 2011-11-11 17:40, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-11-11 17:22, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> WFM
>> ...
>
> -> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1474>
> ...

And, with the next edit I have replaced

	There is  no equivalent counterpart for 301 Moved Permanently.

by

	This specification defines no equivalent counterpart for 301 Moved 
Permanently.

(avoiding the implication that there can't be one in the future).

<sorryforthecheckinnoise/>

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 16:45:35 UTC